![]() ![]() ![]() The sight of a glory tells of that world's strangeness. Yet that could still leave us less than satisfied, it predicts but it fails to explain in terms of the ordinary world. Gustav Mie's scattering theory of 1908 directly derived without approximation from James Clerk Maxwell's 1873 equations of electrodynamics finally predicted the glory very well indeed. But that is as far as it goes for there is no comfortable easily pictured way that waves or diffraction explain the glory's central brightness and multi-coloured sparkling rings. 'Diffraction', the interaction between waves scattered by small fog droplets must play a role. In a sense it is even beyond that of waves. The glory centred opposite the sun is certainly past ray optics' reach. The contrast between sunlit and shadowed mist is beyond their accounting. Reality - rays or waves, or more? Geometric rays neatly explain the shape of Rasid's shadow tunneling through mist to create the eerie Brocken Spectre. Two separate phenomena, sometimes together but not always. These phenomena serve as a reminder of the boundless beauty and complexity that can be found right above our heads. Next time you find yourself in the presence of a glory or witness the shadowy figure of a Brocken Spectre, take a moment to appreciate the wonders of our atmosphere and the intricacies of light. ![]() Mie's scattering theory offers a predictive framework for the glory, but it leaves us with a yearning to understand its underlying mechanisms in terms of our familiar world. While geometric rays and diffraction can partially explain the formation of the Brocken Spectre, the glory remains a mysterious phenomenon that defies easy explanation. In summary, the glory and Brocken Spectre are atmospheric optics phenomena that have fascinated scientists and observers alike. Its existence serves as a testament to the complex interactions between light and matter in our atmosphere. The glory, with its central brightness and shimmering rings, continues to intrigue us and reminds us of the strangeness that can be found in our everyday surroundings. However, even with this accurate prediction, we are left with a sense of curiosity as Mie's theory does not provide a clear explanation within the framework of our ordinary world. Mie's theory successfully predicts the glory, as demonstrated by the results obtained from running IRIS simulations. To understand the glory, we turn to Gustav Mie's scattering theory of 1908, which was derived directly from James Clerk Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics. While diffraction, the interaction between waves scattered by small fog droplets, plays a role in the formation of the Brocken Spectre, it fails to fully account for the glory's central brightness and multi-colored sparkling rings. This is where the phenomenon becomes even more perplexing. The contrast between the sunlit and shadowed mist goes beyond the explanation provided by geometric rays. However, there is more to it than just rays or waves. The geometric rays of light can neatly explain the shape of the shadow tunneling through the mist, creating this ethereal spectacle. The figure is often seen on misty mountainsides or clouds, and it is caused by the interaction of sunlight with water droplets in the air. When observed, it appears as a shadowy figure surrounded by a halo of light. While they can sometimes occur together, they are distinct phenomena with their own unique characteristics. Have you ever witnessed the mesmerizing beauty of a glory or the eerie shadow of a Brocken Spectre? These atmospheric optics phenomena are truly captivating, and in this article, we will delve deeper into their intriguing nature. only in Theatre as an element in the proper names of entertainment showplaces, where it is perhaps felt to inspire a perception of bon ton.OPOD - Glory & Brocken Spectre Last updated on SeptemOPOD - Glory & Brocken Spectre: A Fascinating Phenomenon Revealed The -re spelling generally is more justified by conservative etymology, based on French antecedents. The -re spelling, like -our, however, had the authority of Johnson's dictionary behind it and was unmoved in Britain, where it came to be a point of national pride, contra the Yankees.ĭespite Webster's efforts, -re was retained in words with -c- or -g- (such as ogre, acre, the latter of which Webster insisted to the end of his days ought to be aker, and it was so printed in editions of the dictionary during his lifetime). and became standard there over the next 25 years at the urging of Noah Webster (the 1804 edition of his speller, and especially his 1806 dictionary). In the U.S., the change from -re to -er (to match pronunciation) in words such as fibre, centre, theatre began in late 18c. Word-ending that sometimes distinguish British from American English. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |